Biden Extends Big Pharma Immunity Amid CDC Investigation into Vaccine-Related Strokes

Biden Extends Big Pharma Immunity Amid CDC Investigation into Vaccine-Related Strokes

December 30, 20242 min read

In a move that has raised eyebrows across the nation, President Joe Biden’s administration has extended legal immunity for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers through December 31, 2029. This extension coincides with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initiating an investigation into potential links between COVID-19 vaccines and an increase in stroke incidents among certain populations.

Biden protects big pharma


Extension of Legal Immunity

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the extension of liability protections under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. This act shields vaccine manufacturers from legal claims related to the administration or use of their products during a public health emergency. The current extension prolongs these protections until the end of 2029, ensuring that pharmaceutical companies remain insulated from lawsuits pertaining to their COVID-19 vaccines.


CDC Investigation into Vaccine-Related Strokes

Concurrently, the CDC has reported a preliminary safety signal indicating a possible association between the Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and an increased risk of ischemic stroke in individuals aged 65 and older. This has prompted a more in-depth investigation to determine whether there is a causal relationship.


Implications and Speculations

The timing of the immunity extension has led to widespread speculation:

  • Anticipation of Adverse Findings: Some suggest that the administration may be preparing for potential findings from the CDC investigation that could implicate vaccine manufacturers in adverse health outcomes. Extending legal immunity could be a preemptive measure to protect these companies from a surge of lawsuits.

  • Public Trust Concerns: Critics argue that extending immunity while investigating safety concerns sends a conflicting message, potentially undermining public trust in both the vaccines and the institutions responsible for safeguarding public health.

  • Pharmaceutical Influence: There are concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on policy decisions, with some questioning whether the extension serves public interest or corporate protection.


Conclusion

The extension of legal immunity for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers, coinciding with the CDC’s investigation into vaccine-related strokes, raises critical questions about the administration’s foresight and priorities. As the CDC works to uncover the truth behind the potential health risks associated with the vaccines, the public awaits transparency and accountability from both the government and pharmaceutical companies.



Back to Blog